Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Popular
- People

Conversation

Notices

andy (andy@friendica.hubup.pro)'s status on Saturday, 03-Dec-2022 19:28:20 CET andy
in reply to
@heluecht @hypolite @pankraz @tio If I understand you correctly Marco, you are suggesting that admins will define their own reporting categories. Is that right? It would make sense considering the nature of the Fediverse.

I currently have three broad categories in my TOS in terms of reporting content friendica.hubup.pro/tos (See Section 3.) They are Spam, Online Harassment, and Grossly Offensive.

In conversation Saturday, 03-Dec-2022 19:28:20 CET from friendica.hubup.pro permalink
- pankraz (pankraz@freunde.ma-nic.de)'s status on Saturday, 03-Dec-2022 19:28:22 CET pankraz
  @hypolite @heluecht @tio I added an open question concerning the additional report fields (category and rule id).
  
  In conversation Saturday, 03-Dec-2022 19:28:22 CET permalink
- Michael Vogel (heluecht@pirati.ca)'s status on Saturday, 03-Dec-2022 20:58:12 CET Michael Vogel
  in reply to
  @andy @hypolite @pankraz @tio We are using the Mastodon API for that purpose. AFAIK there are some fixed categories there: docs.joinmastodon.org/methods/…
  
  In conversation Saturday, 03-Dec-2022 20:58:12 CET permalink
- pankraz (pankraz@freunde.ma-nic.de)'s status on Saturday, 03-Dec-2022 20:58:13 CET pankraz
  in reply to
  @hypolite @heluecht @andy @tio If the report is posted via API, it should be standardized categories. This would make it easy for a GUI. Also "illegal" as additional category seems sensible.
  
  In conversation Saturday, 03-Dec-2022 20:58:13 CET permalink
- andy (andy@friendica.hubup.pro)'s status on Sunday, 04-Dec-2022 06:21:10 CET andy
  @heluecht @hypolite @pankraz @tio Oh. I think the way I wrote my TOS doesn't readily work for generating rules.
  
  In conversation Sunday, 04-Dec-2022 06:21:10 CET permalink

Public

Conversation

Notices

Feeds