Notices by mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu), page 15
-
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 07-Jul-2016 23:21:07 CEST mcscx2old @suvuk immerhin, das Tröten bleibt uns erspart. -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 07-Jul-2016 23:16:07 CEST mcscx2old @hannes is that a machine for making whisky? -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 07-Jul-2016 22:24:28 CEST mcscx2old @jcaktiv Diaspora kriegt nicht mit, was auf GS geschrieben wird. -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 07-Jul-2016 19:53:27 CEST mcscx2old !fedgroups A group !piano has been created -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Friday, 01-Jul-2016 15:41:34 CEST mcscx2old Huch, die Leute sagen "schönes Wochenende", dann ist ja heut schon wieder Freitag. -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Friday, 01-Jul-2016 13:26:27 CEST mcscx2old I'm considering upgrading a 2010 HP Proliant #DL380 !server with larger harddisks. Right now it has eight HP 146GB SAS disks.
The DL380G5 manual says the largest disks you can upgrade to is "HP 300GB 6G ENTerprise" or to "HP 500GB 3G SATA Midline".
An older (2008) version of the same manual even says 146GB disks are the largest you can use. (According to that I would be able to upgrade at all :-\)
Question is: Is the DL380G5 really that picky about harddisks or can I use the newer and cheaper "HP MSA 300GB 12G SAS 10K"?
What disks do other !server admins use to upgrade a DL380 G5? -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Friday, 01-Jul-2016 00:10:09 CEST mcscx2old @jcaktiv genau, denn das wäre ja dann ungerecht. -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Friday, 01-Jul-2016 00:06:15 CEST mcscx2old @einebiene den 6. Platz wollt' ich eigentlich jetzt verteidigen ;-) Oh, ich sehe übrigens gerade man kann schon seine Prediction-Zahlen für das Semifinale und Finale eintragen :-) https://status.vinilox.eu/attachment/1075027 -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 30-Jun-2016 23:40:01 CEST mcscx2old I've found a #HighAvailabilityCluster howto for #proxmox / #kvm: ur1.ca/pdxpi But it uses a shared NFS server for the guest image, I wonder if that could be avoided by some replication method. !virtualisation -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 30-Jun-2016 21:42:33 CEST mcscx2old @mikael I want to virtualise just 1 windows server. There would be 2 psysical computers (called Master and Slave) with the virtualiser and there should be a synchronising mechanism to sync the guest windows machine from the Master physical computer to the Slave physical computer. The guest machine on Slave could be down all the time. In failover case (=Master system broken) the admin would start the replicated guest machine on Slave, so the users can continue their work with minimal downtime.
Now the question is what virtualisiation platform to use. -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Friday, 17-Jun-2016 00:52:40 CEST mcscx2old @nordpirat man braucht halt Backups. Vielleicht am besten die gute alte Bandsicherung. -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jun-2016 02:51:18 CEST mcscx2old @echosa I use Dirvish. It's an rsync frontend. It stores unchanged files in hardlinks which (I think) apple's time machine does, too. -
mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jun-2016 02:30:01 CEST mcscx2old @einebiene danke für den Hinweis - done :-)