Conversation

Notices

1. mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2016 20:02:51 CET mcscx2old

   • Hannes
   @hannes2peer for my part, I'm personally ok with the FAQ being removed, for the specific reason: 1) it's rather outdated anyway and deals with no-longer supported features like private groups and hidden accounts, 2) many parts go into too much detail or describe rather obvious things..
   
   So the faq could IMO be removed/replaced with some other faq. However I also agree with your opinion: It can't be right if a contributor to a collaborative GPL-like work can ask to remove all their contributions any time later. This would be like Evan Prodromou or a Linux kernel developer asking to remove all their code lines from a work, 2 years later, after others have continued the work. @simsa0
   • mcscx2old (mcscx2old@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2016 20:38:20 CET mcscx2old

     in reply to

     • Hannes
     @hannes2peer you could indeed use q.no's faq. I remember when @tom@s.karp.id.au announced working on it https://social.stormdragon.tk/conversation/96378#notice-100413
     
     Here's the project site https://git.gnu.io/tom/social-doc
     
     @simsa0