Conversation
Notices
-
@hannes2peer There are TOS on q.se (and many other nodes have the same) that prohibit racism, xenophobism, antisemitism etc. Accepting those terms on the one hand but trying to pull out own work if the service's admin is acting like stated in these TOS on the other hand is slightly ambivalent. To me this is a sulky reaction by @simsa0. Like the one kid who owns the ball taking it away when he's losing the soccer match.
-
@hannes2peer Well, then it would have been logical to leave q.se and to move on to some other "free speech" (!sic) node.
-
@simsa0 I didn't know that. Nevertheless, all that discussion is pointless as the FAQ is outdated. I just wanted to state my point of view.
-
@hannes2peer Same to me. It feels to me like a long term on going project, especially looking back on how it changed (merely: evolved) over the years.
-
@simsa0 "Guess not" - yes, that's based on false assumptions. But if you're missing a apologization here it is. But my point of view didn't change: you're acting childish and inconsequential.
Oh, and a (somewhat) fun fact: Joining and using Twitter shows to me how inconsequential you are. Their TOS prohibit the exact same things you're annoyed by Quitter's TOS.
-
@simsa0Â https://gnusocial.de/attachment/3309990
-
@simsa0 Nevermind.